RURAL TREMAIN SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of RURAL TREMAIN SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA (RURAL TREMAIN SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
RURAL TREMAIN SCOTT, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-3150
[January 5, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CF001487E.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Cynthia L. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RURAL TREMAIN SCOTT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rural-tremain-scott-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.