Rural Road Assessment District No. 3 v. Becker
This text of 541 P.2d 1084 (Rural Road Assessment District No. 3 v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These two cases were consolidated for appeal from determinations by the Public Employe Relations Board (PERB) that petitioner (employer), Rural Road Assessment District No. 3, committed an unfair labor practice in discharging respondents (employes) in violation of ORS 243.672(1) (a), (c) of the Oregon Public Employe Relations Act. The Board found that respondents were discharged as a result of their participation in labor organization activities and ordered reinstatement with back pay as authorized by ORS 243.676(2). Petitioner contends that respondents were fired for cause and that the Board’s determinations are not supported by substantial evidence.
Our review is limited to a determination of whether the PERB’s order is “* * * supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence * * ORS 183.480(7) (d).
Thus the only issue before this court in these cases is whether there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the Board that respondents were discharged as a result of their participation in labor organizing activities.
It is sufficient to say that there was ample evidence from which the PERB could conclude, as it did, that the real reason for the discharge of respondents Becker and Pettet was their union activity.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
541 P.2d 1084, 23 Or. App. 141, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rural-road-assessment-district-no-3-v-becker-orctapp-1975.