Rupy v. George Schneider & Co.

286 A.D. 1095, 145 N.Y.S.2d 489

This text of 286 A.D. 1095 (Rupy v. George Schneider & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rupy v. George Schneider & Co., 286 A.D. 1095, 145 N.Y.S.2d 489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel and Ughetta, JJ., concur; Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm, upon the ground that questions of fact were presented for determination by the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 A.D. 1095, 145 N.Y.S.2d 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rupy-v-george-schneider-co-nyappdiv-1955.