Ruppert v. SANDOZ/NORTHRUP KING

628 N.W.2d 596, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 409, 2001 WL 748605
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 27, 2001
DocketC3-01-637
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 628 N.W.2d 596 (Ruppert v. SANDOZ/NORTHRUP KING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruppert v. SANDOZ/NORTHRUP KING, 628 N.W.2d 596, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 409, 2001 WL 748605 (Mich. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 8, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. CivApp. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oakgrove v. McTo
628 N.W.2d 596 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 N.W.2d 596, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 409, 2001 WL 748605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruppert-v-sandoznorthrup-king-minn-2001.