Ruppert v. RBC Centura Bank
This text of 112 So. 3d 563 (Ruppert v. RBC Centura Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the partial summary judgment of foreclosure of an equitable lien. On remand, we direct the trial court to first resolve the issues raised by the Rup-perts in their affirmative defenses before entering judgment.
We note that generally this court will not accept jurisdiction over “piecemeal appeals.” See Flinn v. Flinn, 68 So.3d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (dismissing appeal when party appealed the resolution of one count of a multi-count complaint, and the appealed count was interrelated with the pending counts). We review the summary judgment in this case because it may not be possible to correct the error after the disposition of the entire case. See Fisher v. Tanglewood at Suntree Country Club Condo. Ass’n, 669 So.2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Although this permits piecemeal review, it is the only way to correct an erroneous ruling that may not be subject to correction at a later date.”).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 So. 3d 563, 2013 WL 1442198, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruppert-v-rbc-centura-bank-fladistctapp-2013.