Home/New York Supreme Court/Ruppel v. Schlegel

Ruppel v. Schlegel

7 N.Y.S. 936, 62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 183, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 382, 55 Hun 183, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1390
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 936 (Ruppel v. Schlegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruppel v. Schlegel, 7 N.Y.S. 936, 62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 183, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 382, 55 Hun 183, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1390 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Dykman, J.

The judgment from which this appeal is taken is right, and should be affirmed. Courts of equity entertain jurisdiction over actions for the construction of doubtful provisions in last wills and testaments, in behalf of beneficiaries, executors, and trustees, but the plaintiff occupies no such position or relation. If it be our duty to examine the merits, we concur in the reasons assigned by the surrogate and the court at special term. The judgment should he affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitney v. Whitney
18 N.Y.S. 3 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.Y.S. 936, 62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 183, 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 382, 55 Hun 183, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruppel-v-schlegel-nysupct-1889.