Ruppe v. Osborne
This text of Ruppe v. Osborne (Ruppe v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6073
FERMAN ALVIN RUPPE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
K. L. OSBORNE, Warden; F. M. CULAN, Assistant Warden; LIEUTENANT JOHNSON, Chief of Security; COLIN ANGLICKER, Doctor; K. CULLOP, Corrections Officer; T. PARKS, Nurse, LPN, Marion CC; DOCTOR RENARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-75-7)
Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ferman Alvin Ruppe, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Melvin Edward Williams, GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ferman Alvin Ruppe appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruppe v. Osborne, No.
CA-02-75-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruppe v. Osborne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruppe-v-osborne-ca4-2003.