Rupp v. Christofolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rupp v. Christofolo

272 A.D.2d 856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 856 (Rupp v. Christofolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rupp v. Christofolo, 272 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action entered on the verdict of a jury. Upon the trial a self-serving written statement by defendant was ■ received in evidence. This was error. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., dissent and vote.to affirm, upon the ground that defendant’s Exhibit D, admitted in evidence, was harmless error because essentially all of the statements therein contained were shown in evidence by statements in the report of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles as to the admission of which there was no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of no cause of action entered on the verdict of a jury. Upon the trial a self-serving written statement by defendant was ■ received in evidence. This was error. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., dissent and vote.to affirm, upon the ground that defendant’s Exhibit D, admitted in evidence, was harmless error because essentially all of the statements therein contained were shown in evidence by statements in the report of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles as to the admission of which there was no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rupp-v-christofolo-nyappdiv-1947.