Ruperto Tellez-Meza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 485 F. App'x 878 (Ruperto Tellez-Meza v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ruperto Tellez-Meza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over Tellez-Meza’s petition for review of the denial of his motion to reopen because the agency’s underlying order terminating his removal proceedings was not a final order of removal. See Alcala v. Holder, 568 F.3d 1009, 1013-16 (9th Cir.2009); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9) (“Judicial review of all questions of law and fact ... shall be available only in judicial review of a final order [of removal].”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 F. App'x 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruperto-tellez-meza-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.