Rupert v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

678 N.E.2d 1233, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1498, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1834
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1997·No. 96-2623·Published

Opinion

Wood App. No. WD-95-103. On May 5,1997, appellee/cross-appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed a document titled “Motion to have this matter reviewed by a full court including a replacement for Justice Resnick who has recused herself from consideration of this matter.” Appellee/cross-appellant’s motion is, in substance, a motion for reconsideration of this court’s decision on a previously filed motion for reconsideration, and as such, is not permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee/cross-appellant’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.

Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rupert v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 678 N.E.2d 1233, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1498, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1834 (Ohio 1997).

678 N.E.2d 1233 (Rupert v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.