Rupert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided July 7, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-03060·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION

MISTY A. RUPERT PLAINTIFF

v. CIVIL NO. 20-cv-3060

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner DEFENDANT Social Security Administration

JUDGMENT

For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion dated July 7, 2021, the Court hereby reverses the decision of the Commissioner and remands this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). The parties have sixty days from entry of the judgment on the docket in which to appeal. If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up until 30 days after the judgment becomes “not appealable” i.e., 30 days after the 60-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.C. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 7th day of July 2021. /s/Christy Comstock HON. CHRISTY COMSTOCK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rupert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, (W.D. Ark. 2021).

Rupert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Rupert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)