Rupel Vs. Galten
This text of 490 P.3d 1293 (Rupel Vs. Galten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
J. MILAN RUPEL, No. 82636 Appellant, vs. THERESA GALTEN, FILE Respondent. JUL 3 0 2021
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a decree of divorce. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Bryce C. Duckworth, Judge. When this court's initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed that the notice of appeal may have been prematurely filed, appellant was ordered to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See NRAP 4(a)(6). The parties have now filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal without prejudice, asserting that the challenged order is not final. They ask that this matter be remanded to the district court for resolution of the outstanding issues. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). Upon dismissal, jurisdiction over this matter returns to the district court. Thus, no remand is necessary. Any aggrieved party may file a new notice of appeal from any appealable order entered by the district court. It is so ORDERED.
SUPREME COURT C.J. OF NEVADA
1947A • - 211 b g
!`' cc: Hon. Bryce C. Duckworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlernent Judge Barnes Law Group, LLC Law Offices of F. Peter James, Esq. Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEYADA
ith 1947A 44* 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 P.3d 1293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rupel-vs-galten-nev-2021.