Ruotolo v. Tietjen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Ruotolo v. Tietjen

896 A.2d 101, 277 Conn. 929, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 127

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 31, 2006

DocketSC 17640

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 A.2d 101 (Ruotolo v. Tietjen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruotolo v. Tietjen, 896 A.2d 101, 277 Conn. 929, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 127 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants Riefe Tietjen, executor of the estate of John N. Swanson, Marion Fessenden and Geraldine Augeri, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 432 (AC 25239), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*930 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17640. Jeffrey T. Beatty and J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Decided March 31, 2006

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 45a-441 is applicable to the facts of the present case?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants Riefe Tietjen, executor of the estate of John N. Swanson, Marion Fessenden and Geraldine Augeri, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 432 (AC 25239), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*930 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17640. Jeffrey T. Beatty and J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Decided March 31, 2006

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 45a-441 is applicable to the facts of the present case?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 A.2d 101, 277 Conn. 929, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruotolo-v-tietjen-conn-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack