Ruotolo v. Benjamin Franklin Corp.

441 A.2d 1185, 122 N.H. 149, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 305
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 19, 1982·No. No. 81-256·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from a Superior Court (Batchelder, J.) decision denying the plaintiffs’ petition to enjoin foreclosure of a mortgage on eleven hundred acres of land in Alton. The mortgagors agree that the note has been in default for several years, that the mortgagee can legally foreclose, and that notice was proper.

[150]*150The superior court has equitable powers under RSA 498:1 (Supp. 1979) to enjoin a mortgage foreclosure if the equities of the situation warrant. Meredith v. Fisher, 121 N.H. 856, 858, 435 A.2d 536, 537 (1981).

Because of the substantial period of default, we find that the superior court did not err in denying the injunction on the ground that further delay would be inequitable. Nor do we find proof of a novation as the mortgagors allege.

Affirmed.

Batchelder, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruotolo v. Benjamin Franklin Corp., 441 A.2d 1185, 122 N.H. 149, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 305 (N.H. 1982).

441 A.2d 1185 (Ruotolo v. Benjamin Franklin Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arthur Young & Co. v. Sutherland
631 A.2d 354 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)