Ruotolo v. Benjamin Franklin Corp.
This text of 441 A.2d 1185 (Ruotolo v. Benjamin Franklin Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion
This is an appeal from a Superior Court (Batchelder, J.) decision denying the plaintiffs’ petition to enjoin foreclosure of a mortgage on eleven hundred acres of land in Alton. The mortgagors agree that the note has been in default for several years, that the mortgagee can legally foreclose, and that notice was proper.
[150]*150The superior court has equitable powers under RSA 498:1 (Supp. 1979) to enjoin a mortgage foreclosure if the equities of the situation warrant. Meredith v. Fisher, 121 N.H. 856, 858, 435 A.2d 536, 537 (1981).
Because of the substantial period of default, we find that the superior court did not err in denying the injunction on the ground that further delay would be inequitable. Nor do we find proof of a novation as the mortgagors allege.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 A.2d 1185, 122 N.H. 149, 1982 N.H. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruotolo-v-benjamin-franklin-corp-nh-1982.