Ruocchio v. Golod
This text of 237 A.D. 912 (Ruocchio v. Golod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Inconsistent findings of fact and conclusions of law are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made in accordance herewith. In our opinion, the quitclaim deed from Shults to the plaintiff, dated August 25, 1930, was void under section 260 of the Real Property Law, because, for a period of at least ten years prior thereto, the defendants and their predecessors and tenants had been in the actual physical possession, of the land in question, which possession was under a claim of title and was open, notorious, continuous, exclusive and adverse to all other persons. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruocchio-v-golod-nyappdiv-1933.