Runser v. City of Dayton, Ohio

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JACK RUNSER, :

Plaintiff, : : Case No. 3:21-CV-160 vs District Judge Thomas M. Rose :

: CITY OF DAYTON, et al., : Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY The Court having been advised on or about June 28, 2023, that the above matter is now resolved, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated within the sixty (60) day period. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas M. Rose Date: June 29, 2023 Thomas M. Rose, Judge United States District Court