Runquist v. W. H. Ferrell & Co.

133 N.W. 1134, 116 Minn. 530, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1012
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 1, 1911
DocketNos. 17,282—(96)
StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.W. 1134 (Runquist v. W. H. Ferrell & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Runquist v. W. H. Ferrell & Co., 133 N.W. 1134, 116 Minn. 530, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1012 (Mich. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The substantial question in this case is whether defendant was entitled to an instructed verdict at the close of the trial. The action was for the breach of a contract for the purchase and sale of five carloads of potatoes and plaintiff had a verdict. We find in the record evidence sufficient to send the case to the jury upon all questions involved under the pleadings and conclude therefore, without discussion, that the court below properly refused to direct a verdict for defendant. The record presents no errors justifying a new trial.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.W. 1134, 116 Minn. 530, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/runquist-v-w-h-ferrell-co-minn-1911.