Runge v. Runge

North Dakota Supreme Court

Runge v. Runge

2001 ND 39, 625 N.W.2d 264

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 20, 2001

Docket20000121

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2001 ND 39 (Runge v. Runge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Runge v. Runge, 2001 ND 39, 625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1

[¶ 1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.

[¶ 3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI