Rung v. Rung
678 So. 2d 9, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645, 1996 WL 465555
Opinion
ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION
On motion for rehearing and clarification we substitute the following for our original opinion, reported at 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1282 (Fla. 1st DCA May 28,1996).
We reverse and remand, with directions that the trial court incorporate the parties’ stipulation that the marital home be sold and partitioned into the final judgment. Rhoden v. Rhoden, 538 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In all other respects, we affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage without comment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rung v. Rung, 678 So. 2d 9, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645, 1996 WL 465555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
678 So. 2d 9 (Rung v. Rung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rhoden v. Rhoden
538 So. 2d 1274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)