Rung v. Rung

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rung v. Rung

678 So. 2d 9, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645, 1996 WL 465555

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3588

StatusPublished

This text of 678 So. 2d 9 (Rung v. Rung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rung v. Rung, 678 So. 2d 9, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8645, 1996 WL 465555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

On motion for rehearing and clarification we substitute the following for our original opinion, reported at 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1282 (Fla. 1st DCA May 28,1996).

We reverse and remand, with directions that the trial court incorporate the parties’ stipulation that the marital home be sold and partitioned into the final judgment. Rhoden v. Rhoden, 538 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In all other respects, we affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage without comment.

JOANOS, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI