Rundgren v. Greenwell

659 So. 2d 289, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10008, 1994 WL 568499
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1994·No. No. 94-1703·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this common law certiorari we review the trial court’s order compelling a party’s medical expert to respond to certain discovery. The order under review was entered prior to our recent en banc opinion in Syken v. Elkins, 644 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Based upon the authority of Syken we quash the order under review and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Syken.

Order under review quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rundgren v. Greenwell, 659 So. 2d 289, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10008, 1994 WL 568499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

659 So. 2d 289 (Rundgren v. Greenwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lawrence
65 So. 3d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Lugo v. State
2 So. 3d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)