Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rundgren v. Greenwell

Rundgren v. Greenwell

659 So. 2d 289, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10008, 1994 WL 568499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 1994
DocketNo. 94-1703
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 659 So. 2d 289 (Rundgren v. Greenwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rundgren v. Greenwell, 659 So. 2d 289, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10008, 1994 WL 568499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this common law certiorari we review the trial court’s order compelling a party’s medical expert to respond to certain discovery. The order under review was entered prior to our recent en banc opinion in Syken v. Elkins, 644 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Based upon the authority of Syken we quash the order under review and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Syken.

Order under review quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lawrence
65 So. 3d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Lugo v. State
2 So. 3d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
659 So. 2d 289, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10008, 1994 WL 568499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rundgren-v-greenwell-fladistctapp-1994.