Rundell v. Blakeslee

11 N.W. 392, 47 Mich. 575, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 703
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1882·Published

Opinion

Marston, J.

This case comes before us on a writ of certiorari to review proceedings in laying out a private way. The jury certified that after viewing the premises and hearing the arguments of the parties interested, “We do adjudge, and deterinine that a private highway be established,” commencing, etc., and they assess the damages. There is no. finding of necessity, nor the equivalent thereof. Jurors, may be willing to establish a highway or private way and yet not be willing to find that any necessity therefor exists. Such a finding is however essential. Ayres v. Richards 38 Mich. 216.

The proceedings must be quashed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rundell v. Blakeslee, 11 N.W. 392, 47 Mich. 575, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 703 (Mich. 1882).

11 N.W. 392 (Rundell v. Blakeslee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Ayres v. Richards
38 Mich. 214 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)