Runco v. DiJoseph
142 A.2d 27, 186 Pa. Super. 97, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 438
Opinion
Opinion
The order of the lower court, in effect adjudging forfeit $1,520 taken from the person of appellant after his conviction of bookmaking, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Corson, reported in 11 Pa. D. & C. 2d 735.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Runco v. DiJoseph, 142 A.2d 27, 186 Pa. Super. 97, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 438 (Pa. Ct. App. 1958).
142 A.2d 27 (Runco v. DiJoseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. City of Oakland
193 Cal. App. 2d 165 (California Court of Appeal, 1961)