Runck v. Quaile

Court of Appeals of Texas

Runck v. Quaile

15 S.W.2d 35, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 290

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 6, 1929

DocketNo. 8163.

StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.W.2d 35 (Runck v. Quaile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Runck v. Quaile, 15 S.W.2d 35, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 290 (Tex. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

*36 SMITH, J,

The appeal presents questions purely of fact, which the trial court resolved against appellant. The controlling issue was one of whether or not a certain sum of $250 paid to appellee by one Schott was for the benefit of appellant, with appellee’s knowledge. Appellant and appellee testified freely upon the point, their testimony being in direct conflict. The issue thus raised was therefore for the trial court, whose determination thereof against appellant is binding upon this court. This matter is presented in appellant’s first and only proposition of law, which must be overruled. This settles the appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*36 SMITH, J,

The appeal presents questions purely of fact, which the trial court resolved against appellant. The controlling issue was one of whether or not a certain sum of $250 paid to appellee by one Schott was for the benefit of appellant, with appellee’s knowledge. Appellant and appellee testified freely upon the point, their testimony being in direct conflict. The issue thus raised was therefore for the trial court, whose determination thereof against appellant is binding upon this court. This matter is presented in appellant’s first and only proposition of law, which must be overruled. This settles the appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.W.2d 35, 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/runck-v-quaile-texapp-1929.