Runci v. Vernal
557 A.2d 202, 1989 Me. LEXIS 104
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Robert and Lorraine Vernal appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Maclnnes, A.R.J.) denying their motion to dissolve an ex parte order of attachment previously granted to Michael Runci by the court (Beaulieu, J.). Because the Vemals fail to demonstrate that Run-ci’s claim is so insubstantial as to foreclose a reasonable chance of recovery, we affirm. Burns v. Smith, 495 A.2d 777, 778 n. 2 (Me.1985).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Runci v. Vernal, 557 A.2d 202, 1989 Me. LEXIS 104 (Me. 1989).
557 A.2d 202 (Runci v. Vernal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burns v. Smith
495 A.2d 777 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)