Runci v. Vernal

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Runci v. Vernal

557 A.2d 202, 1989 Me. LEXIS 104

DecidedMay 2, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 557 A.2d 202 (Runci v. Vernal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Runci v. Vernal, 557 A.2d 202, 1989 Me. LEXIS 104 (Me. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert and Lorraine Vernal appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Maclnnes, A.R.J.) denying their motion to dissolve an ex parte order of attachment previously granted to Michael Runci by the court (Beaulieu, J.). Because the Vemals fail to demonstrate that Run-ci’s claim is so insubstantial as to foreclose a reasonable chance of recovery, we affirm. Burns v. Smith, 495 A.2d 777, 778 n. 2 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI