Runals v. Brown

11 Wis. 185
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 4, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Cole, J.

This case must follow the decision in the case of Rines vs. Boyd et al., 7 Wis., 155. We there held that it was the imperative duty of the circuit court to remove the cause when the prescribed petition was presented. It is true the application in that case was made under chapter 51, General Laws, 1853, but that statute has been substantially embraced in chapter 123, R. S., under which the application in the present case was made. The petition for the change of the place of trial was in conformity to the statute, and the application should have been granted.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings, in accordance with this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Runals v. Brown, 11 Wis. 185 (Wis. 1860).

11 Wis. 185 (Runals v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golos v. Worzalla
190 N.W. 114 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
City of Detroit v. Detroit City Ry. Co.
54 F. 1 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1893)
Fatt v. Fatt
48 N.W. 52 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1891)
Hewitt v. Follett
8 N.W. 177 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1881)
Risto v. Harris
18 Wis. 400 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1864)