Rumsey v. Utz
This text of 232 A.D. 779 (Rumsey v. Utz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified by striking therefrom item (3) of the matters concerning which defendant Utz is to be examined and by providing that item (2) thereof be changed so as to read as follows: “ All communications between defendant and Theodore Utz and Kathryn Wiske in so far as they constitute a part of plaintiff’s alleged services rendered.” As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the order. Bill of particulars to be served within five days from entry of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumsey-v-utz-nyappdiv-1931.