Rumsey v. Seneca Washed Gravel Corp.

269 A.D. 1010, 59 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5023

This text of 269 A.D. 1010 (Rumsey v. Seneca Washed Gravel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rumsey v. Seneca Washed Gravel Corp., 269 A.D. 1010, 59 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff, however, if so advised, and if the facts warrant it, to apply at the Special Term within twenty days after service of a copy of the order herein for a rehearing upon new or additional affidavits in which may be incorporated evidentiary facts disclosing a triable issue of fact under the pleading. (As to procedure, see Newman v. Special, 257 App. Div. 1030.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action on promissory notes.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, McCum, Larkin and Love, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newman v. Special
257 A.D. 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D. 1010, 59 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumsey-v-seneca-washed-gravel-corp-nyappdiv-1945.