Rumph v. Waring

29 S.C. Eq. 136
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 15, 1855
StatusPublished

This text of 29 S.C. Eq. 136 (Rumph v. Waring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rumph v. Waring, 29 S.C. Eq. 136 (S.C. Ct. App. 1855).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This Court is entirely satified with the proof of the freedom of the persons in whose behalf this suit is brought; but is compelled reluctantly to deny the relief sought for want of jurisdiction. The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed.

Johnston, Donkin, Dakgan and Wardlaw, CO., con- - curring.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.C. Eq. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumph-v-waring-scctapp-1855.