Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rumph v. State

Rumph v. State

527 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1364, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2430, 1988 WL 59573
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1988·No. No. 87-1301·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error. The procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rumph v. State, 527 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1364, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2430, 1988 WL 59573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

527 So. 2d 270 (Rumph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patton v. State
878 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
South v. HEARTLAND EMP. & TRAINING ADMIN.
527 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)