Rumph v. State
527 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1364, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2430, 1988 WL 59573
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 8, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1301
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 527 So. 2d 270 (Rumph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rumph v. State, 527 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1364, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2430, 1988 WL 59573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion is facially insufficient to raise any fundamental error. The procedural error complained of occurred during trial and should have been raised on appeal from the judgment of conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patton v. State
878 So. 2d 368 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
South v. HEARTLAND EMP. & TRAINING ADMIN.
527 So. 2d 270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
527 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1364, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2430, 1988 WL 59573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumph-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.