Rumph v. Cleveland
This text of 72 Ga. 189 (Rumph v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Rumph sued Cleveland in a justice’s court, and obtained judgment. The case was carried to the superior Gourt by certiorari. At the first term it was called, and defendant in certiorari filed exceptions to the answer thereto because it did not fully set forth the testimony. At the next term, when the case was called, plaintiff in car iiorari moved to dismiss the exceptions because they were not sworn to. The court sustained the motion and dismissed the exceptions, giving as an additional reason therefor that defendant in certiorari did not at the first term take an order requiring the justice to re-answer. The certiorari was sustained, and the defendant therein excepted.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 Ga. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumph-v-cleveland-ga-1883.