Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.
This text of 136 F. 873 (Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems unnecessary to alter the phraseology of the decree, which does not now require an ascertainment of the profits made by the Provident Chemical Works in manufacturing the phosphatic-acid element. As to acid made by it and sold to the New York Baking Powder Company it is a contributory infringer, and is liable equally with the baking powder company for profits or damages resulting from the sale of. baking powder in which the acid contributed by it has entered as an element.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 F. 873, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumford-chemical-works-v-new-york-baking-powder-co-circtsdny-1905.