Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.

136 F. 873, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5185

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 3, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to alter the phraseology of the decree, which does not now require an ascertainment of the profits made by the Provident Chemical Works in manufacturing the phosphatic-acid element. As to acid made by it and sold to the New York Baking Powder Company it is a contributory infringer, and is liable equally with the baking powder company for profits or damages resulting from the sale of. baking powder in which the acid contributed by it has entered as an element.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to alter the phraseology of the decree, which does not now require an ascertainment of the profits made by the Provident Chemical Works in manufacturing the phosphatic-acid element. As to acid made by it and sold to the New York Baking Powder Company it is a contributory infringer, and is liable equally with the baking powder company for profits or damages resulting from the sale of. baking powder in which the acid contributed by it has entered as an element.

Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co., 136 F. 873, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 5185 (circtsdny 1905).

Pincite

136 F. 873 (Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related