Rumbaugh v. State

1929 OK CR 236, 278 P. 399, 43 Okla. Crim. 304, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 15, 1929
DocketNo. A-6761.
StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 236 (Rumbaugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rumbaugh v. State, 1929 OK CR 236, 278 P. 399, 43 Okla. Crim. 304, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

DAVENPORT, J.

The plaintiff in error, for convenience referred to as the defendant, was convicted on a eharge of transporting whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment for a period of 30 days. Record was perfected and case appealed to this court.

This is a companion case to No. A-6673, Fred Nowlin v. State, 43 Okla. Cr. 305, 278 Pac. 398, in which an opinion has been handed down by this court to-day. The same witnesses testify as in No. A-6673, and the alleged offense occurred at the same place and at the same time. It is not deemed necessary to set out the testimony in substance or in full in this opinion.

For reasons stated in case No. A-6673, this case is reversed and remanded.

EDWARD'S, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nowlin v. State
1929 OK CR 235 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1929 OK CR 236, 278 P. 399, 43 Okla. Crim. 304, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumbaugh-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.