Rumage v. State
This text of 324 S.W.2d 865 (Rumage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a plea of guilty before the court without a jury, appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for 10 years.
No statement of facts accompanies the record.
The record presents two formal bills of exception by which appellant com *866 plains of the fact that he had not been served with a copy of the indictment at the time of trial and to the court’s action in refusing to permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty and change the plea to one of not guilty.
The questions presented are the same as those urged and this day overruled in Milligan v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 324 S.W.2d 864.
No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 S.W.2d 865, 1959 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rumage-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.