Rulofson v. Mayor of Oaklyn

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rulofson v. Mayor of Oaklyn

2 N.J. Misc. 709, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 123

DecidedJuly 8, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 709 (Rulofson v. Mayor of Oaklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rulofson v. Mayor of Oaklyn, 2 N.J. Misc. 709, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 123 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Oüeiam.

The alternative writ in this case directs the mayor and commissioners of the borough of Oaldyn to apportion certain taxes and municipal liens assessed against certain lots belonging to the relator and located in said borough, or to show cause why it should not he ordered to do so.

The demurrer admits the truth of the facts set out in the alternative writ, and our examination and consideration of those facts leads us to the conclusion that the relator is entitled to the relief which he seeks. A peremptory writ will be issued against the mayor and commissioners of the borough, directing them to make the apportionment in the manner specified in the alternative writ.

The relator is entitled to costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Oüeiam.

The alternative writ in this case directs the mayor and commissioners of the borough of Oaldyn to apportion certain taxes and municipal liens assessed against certain lots belonging to the relator and located in said borough, or to show cause why it should not he ordered to do so.

The demurrer admits the truth of the facts set out in the alternative writ, and our examination and consideration of those facts leads us to the conclusion that the relator is entitled to the relief which he seeks. A peremptory writ will be issued against the mayor and commissioners of the borough, directing them to make the apportionment in the manner specified in the alternative writ.

The relator is entitled to costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J. Misc. 709, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rulofson-v-mayor-of-oaklyn-nj-1924.