RULO v. State
282 S.W.3d 884, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 582, 2009 WL 1287898
Opinion
ORDER
Lonnie Rulo appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
RULO v. State, 282 S.W.3d 884, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 582, 2009 WL 1287898 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 884 (RULO v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.