Ruleman v. State
810 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3524, 2002 WL 429250
This text of 810 So. 2d 1082 (Ruleman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruleman v. State, 810 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3524, 2002 WL 429250 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for the underlying offense of fleeing and eluding as well as the direct criminal contempt, but remand for the trial [1083]*1083court to correct the administrative probation order and the judgment to reflect that appellant entered a guilty plea, not a nolo contendere plea.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1082, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3524, 2002 WL 429250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruleman-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.