Rule v. Gentry
This text of 415 P.3d 1004 (Rule v. Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court decision denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The documents before this court indicate that a petition has not been filed in district court case number A748886, the case number designated in this notice of appeal, since December 30, 2016. Notice of entry of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order was filed on September 14, 2017. Thus, to the extent appellant appeals from this order, the notice of appeal is untimely filed. "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State ,
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
415 P.3d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rule-v-gentry-nev-2018.