Home/California Court of Appeal/Ruland v. All Persons, Etc.

Ruland v. All Persons, Etc.

125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 275, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 43
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 15, 1912
DocketCiv. No. 1023.
StatusPublished

This text of 125 P. 939 (Ruland v. All Persons, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruland v. All Persons, Etc., 125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 275, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 43 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

This case also involves the same questions as those decided in Bagley v. Bloom et al., ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein filed, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bagley v. City & County of San Francisco
125 P. 931 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 275, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruland-v-all-persons-etc-calctapp-1912.