Ruland v. All Persons, Etc.

125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 275, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 43
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 15, 1912·No. Civ. No. 1023.·Published

Opinion

This case also involves the same questions as those decided in Bagley v. Bloom et al., ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein filed, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruland v. All Persons, Etc., 125 P. 939, 19 Cal. App. 275, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 43 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

125 P. 939 (Ruland v. All Persons, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bagley v. City & County of San Francisco
125 P. 931 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)