Rukasin v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rukasin v. Harrison

198 A.D. 925

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1921·Published

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint and bill of particulars charged merely that defendant permitted the alleged defect in the sidewalk in front of his premises to continue, and not at all that he performed any affirmative act which caused the defect. (See Krebs v. Heitmann, 104 App. Div. 173.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint and bill of particulars charged merely that defendant permitted the alleged defect in the sidewalk in front of his premises to continue, and not at all that he performed any affirmative act which caused the defect. (See Krebs v. Heitmann, 104 App. Div. 173.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur.

Rukasin v. Harrison, 198 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

198 A.D. 925 (Rukasin v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related