Rukasin v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rukasin v. Harrison

198 A.D. 925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D. 925 (Rukasin v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rukasin v. Harrison, 198 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint and bill of particulars charged merely that defendant permitted the alleged defect in the sidewalk in front of his premises to continue, and not at all that he performed any affirmative act which caused the defect. (See Krebs v. Heitmann, 104 App. Div. 173.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint and bill of particulars charged merely that defendant permitted the alleged defect in the sidewalk in front of his premises to continue, and not at all that he performed any affirmative act which caused the defect. (See Krebs v. Heitmann, 104 App. Div. 173.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rukasin-v-harrison-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack