Ruiz v. Walt Disney World Co.

677 So. 2d 421, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8335, 1996 WL 442126
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1996·No. No. 96-320·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order transferring venue is affirmed. See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995); Walt Disney World Co. v. Leff, 323 So.2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)(finding defendant did not have agents in county selected as forum and was thus entitled to transfer). Cf. Premier Cruise Lines v. Gavrilis, 554 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)(affirming the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to transfer venue where evidence had been submitted that a representative of the defendant cruise line had stated that travel agents in the county [422] selected as forum were agents of the cruise line).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruiz v. Walt Disney World Co., 677 So. 2d 421, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8335, 1996 WL 442126 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

677 So. 2d 421 (Ruiz v. Walt Disney World Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walt Disney World Co. v. Diaz
691 So. 2d 1150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)