Ruiz v. Walt Disney World Co.
This text of 677 So. 2d 421 (Ruiz v. Walt Disney World Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order transferring venue is affirmed. See § 47.051, Fla. Stat. (1995); Walt Disney World Co. v. Leff, 323 So.2d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)(finding defendant did not have agents in county selected as forum and was thus entitled to transfer). Cf. Premier Cruise Lines v. Gavrilis, 554 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)(affirming the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to transfer venue where evidence had been submitted that a representative of the defendant cruise line had stated that travel agents in the county [422]*422selected as forum were agents of the cruise line).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 So. 2d 421, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8335, 1996 WL 442126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-walt-disney-world-co-fladistctapp-1996.