Ruiz v. VERMEULEN

44 So. 3d 667, 2010 WL 3893858

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ruiz v. VERMEULEN. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15013 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2010·No. 4D09-1463·Published

Opinion

44 So.3d 667 (2010)

No. 4D09-1463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 6, 2010.

David H. Freedman, North Miami, for appellant.

Robert D. Burgs of Robert D. Burgs, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dervishi v. Dervishi, 905 So.2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

44 So.3d 667 (2010)

No. 4D09-1463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 6, 2010.

David H. Freedman, North Miami, for appellant.

Robert D. Burgs of Robert D. Burgs, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dervishi v. Dervishi, 905 So.2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Ruiz v. VERMEULEN, 44 So. 3d 667, 2010 WL 3893858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

44 So. 3d 667 (Ruiz v. VERMEULEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

905 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

44 So. 3d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)