Ruiz v. State
Opinion
We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. A thorough review of the record reveals that defendant is entitled to have vacated the sentence imposed pursuant to the conviction on count five, possession of a firearm. As the state correctly conceded in response to a petition for writ of habeas corpus previously filed by defendant, defendant is entitled to the benefit of Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), which was decided during the pen-dency of defendant’s appeal, and which renders the sentence for count five illegal. Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992).
Order reversed; sentence vacated; cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
652 So. 2d 520 (Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.