Ruiz v. State

652 So. 2d 520, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3614, 1995 WL 170361
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1995·No. No. 95-400·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. A thorough review of the record reveals that defendant is entitled to have vacated the sentence imposed pursuant to the conviction on count five, possession of a firearm. As the state correctly conceded in response to a petition for writ of habeas corpus previously filed by defendant, defendant is entitled to the benefit of Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), which was decided during the pen-dency of defendant’s appeal, and which renders the sentence for count five illegal. Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992).

Order reversed; sentence vacated; cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruiz v. State, 652 So. 2d 520, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3614, 1995 WL 170361 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 520 (Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
598 So. 2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Carawan v. State
515 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)