Ruiz v. State
441 So. 2d 1152, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24220
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1983·No. No. 82-2393·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the revocation of a probation upon the state showing of a subsequent unrelated conviction entered pursuant to a nolo contendere plea relying upon the reasoning contained in Bradford v. State, 435 So.2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and Maselli v. State, 425 So.2d 176 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983), recognizing that these opinions are in conflict with Donaldson v. State, 407 So.2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (Cobb, J., dissenting).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruiz v. State, 441 So. 2d 1152, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24220 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
441 So. 2d 1152 (Ruiz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruiz v. State
462 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)