Ruiz v. Snodgrass

557 F. App'x 603
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2014
DocketNo. 13-3369
StatusPublished

This text of 557 F. App'x 603 (Ruiz v. Snodgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruiz v. Snodgrass, 557 F. App'x 603 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Raul Ruiz appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. After carefully reviewing the record, see Kaden v. Slykhuis, 651 F.3d 966, 968 (8th Cir.2011) (per curiam) (de novo review of preservice dismissal), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and deny Ruiz’s motion for appointment of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaden v. Slykhuis
651 F.3d 966 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 F. App'x 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-snodgrass-ca8-2014.