Ruiz v. Musa

2022 Ohio 335
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 7, 2022
Docket2022-L-003
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 Ohio 335 (Ruiz v. Musa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruiz v. Musa, 2022 Ohio 335 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

[Cite as Ruiz v. Musa, 2022-Ohio-335.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY

CHELSEA K. RUIZ, CASE NO. 2022-L-003

Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division DANIEL MUSA,

Defendant-Appellee. Trial Court No. 2013 DR 000189

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Decided: February 7, 2022 Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Cory R. Hinton, Hanahan & Hinton, LLC, 8570 Mentor Avenue, Mentor, OH 44060 (For Plaintiff-Appellant).

Jon D. Axelrod, Axelrod Law Office, 7976 Tyler Boulevard, Mentor, OH 44060 (For Defendant-Appellee).

Denise Cook, 154 East Aurora Road, PMB #231, Northfield, OH 44067 (Guardian Ad Litem).

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Chelsea K. Ruiz, through counsel, filed an appeal on January 7,

2022, from a Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, entry.

{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing

a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has

held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17,

citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988).

{¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal

from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.

3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of

courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the

judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the

time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance

docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005-Ohio-5360.

{¶4} Here, the record shows the trial court issued its entry on December 7, 2021.

The clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R.

58(B) was issued to the parties on December 10, 2021. Since appellant was served

within the three-day period required in Civ.R. 58(B), the thirty-day period began to run on

the date of entry of judgment i.e., December 7, 2021. The deadline for appellant to file

his notice of appeal was January 6, 2022, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus,

appellant’s January 7, 2022 appeal was untimely filed.

{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.

Pendell, supra at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed

pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).

MATT LYNCH, J., JOHN J. EKLUND, J., concur. 2

Case No. 2022-L-003

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re H.F.
2008 Ohio 6810 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.
839 N.E.2d 982 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections
531 N.E.2d 713 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 Ohio 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-musa-ohioctapp-2022.