Ruiz v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-50436 USDC No. W-96-CV-294
HUMBERTO RUIZ,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Dep’t of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, in his official capacity,
Respondent-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas - - - - - - - - - - April 28, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Humberto Ruiz, Texas prisoner # A90970325, has filed an
application pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a) for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, following the district
court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition, which it
construed as a civil rights suit, for failure to state a claim
upon which relief could be granted.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-50436 -2-
The district court erred in construing Ruiz’s habeas corpus
petition as a civil rights complaint. See Preiser v. Rodriguez,
411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). Because Ruiz has been released from
custody for his state court criminal conviction, his habeas
challenge seeking the restoration of good-time credits is moot.
See Spencer v. Kemna, 118 S. Ct. 978, 983-88 (1978).
Ruiz’s motions for discovery and for summary judgment are
also DENIED as moot.
Ruiz has not presented a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Because Ruiz has not demonstrated a
nonfrivolous issue for appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is
DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruiz v. Johnson (Ruiz v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.