Ruiz v. Hatton
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MATTHEW RUIZ, Case No. 17-cv-06706-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 9 Vv. REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 10 SHAWN HATTON, Docket No. 27 11 Defendant. a 12
13 Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of appealability. See 28
14 || U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is 15 || DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that “jurists of reason would find it debatable 16 || whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right... .” Slack v.
= 17 || McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
18 The Clerk shall forward to the Court of Appeals the case file with this order. See United 19 States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 This order disposes of Docket No. 27. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 || Dated: October 8, 2019 25 LL 26 : ifr __§_4H ED M.C 27 United States District Judge 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ruiz v. Hatton (Ruiz v. Hatton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.