Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

D. Arizona

Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided February 3, 2020·No. 4:18-cv-00292·Unknown

Opinion

WO Rebecca Ruiz, No. CV-18-0292-TUC-BGM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Currently pending before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. 24). Having reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ motion (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees of $1,847.55 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595–98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but □□ delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiffs counsel at the following address: Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm, 5240 East Pima Street, Tucson, Arizona 85712. Dated this 31st day of January, 2020. ° See PD Pe Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald United States Magistrate Judge

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WO Rebecca Ruiz, No. CV-18-0292-TUC-BGM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Currently pending before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulated Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 26 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (Doc. 24). Having reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties’ motion (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees of $1,847.55 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595–98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but □□ delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. Any check for EAJA fees shall be mailed to Plaintiffs counsel at the following address: Hallinan & Killpack Law Firm, 5240 East Pima Street, Tucson, Arizona 85712. Dated this 31st day of January, 2020. ° See PD Pe Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald United States Magistrate Judge

_2-

Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2020).

Pincite

Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related