Ruiz v. Black
468 N.E.2d 1117, 63 N.Y.2d 690, 479 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4542
This text of 468 N.E.2d 1117 (Ruiz v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruiz v. Black, 468 N.E.2d 1117, 63 N.Y.2d 690, 479 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4542 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Brosnan v Black, 63 NY2d 692, and Matter ofWohl v Miller, 63 NY2d 687 [decided herewith]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MATTER OF BROSNAN v. Black
468 N.E.2d 1117 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
MATTER OF WOHL v. Miller
468 N.E.2d 1110 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
468 N.E.2d 1117, 63 N.Y.2d 690, 479 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-black-ny-1984.