Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co.
This text of Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co. (Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Inasmuch as counsel for plaintiff will receive every fourth check for permanent total disability compensation owing to plaintiff on an ongoing basis and that plaintiff is permanently and totally disabled due to his severe compensable injuries and therefore is in need of attendant care services at the market rate, not at 75% of the market rate, in order to complete daily living tasks, the motion of plaintiffs counsel must be, and hereby is DENIED.
S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruiz-v-belk-masonry-co-ncworkcompcom-2000.